EU‘s Global Strategy for Foreign and Security Policy: Implications for Eastern European Security

thumbnail of 2016-07 EU Global Strategy Implications for Eastern Europe 2016 C-ENG

Upon proposal of the EESRI Foundation, a selection of experts commented on the probable implications of the adopted “Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy” for establishing a more peaceful, stable and secure environment in the Eastern European region. (PDF) Grigorij Mesežnikov, Vera Axyonova, Daniel Szeligowski, Gražvydas Jasutis, Dušan Fisher, Armen Grigoryan, Oleksandr Tytarchuk, Zuzana Novakova, Rusif Huseynov, Maksym Khylko

CSBMs in Handling Current Protracted Conflicts: The Transdniestrian Case

thumbnail of 2016-07 CSBMs in Protracted Conflicts – OSCE Network – Tytarchuk EESRI-PC-ENG

Presentation delivered by Oleksandr Tytarchuk on behalf of the EESRI Foundation at the Workshop “Protracted Conflicts in the OSCE Region: Innovative Approaches for Co-operation in the Conflict Zones,” held by the OSCE Network of Think Tanks and Academic Institutions, in Vienna, Austria, on July 4, 2016. (PDF) Oleksandr Tytarchuk

“Ukrainian Conflict”: On the Edge between Hybrid War and Hybrid Peace

thumbnail of 2016-07 Frozen Conflicts – IOS Regensburg – Tytarchuk, Khylko EESRI-CP-ENG

Presentation by Oleksandr Tytarchuk and Maksym Khylko delivered on behalf of the EESRI Foundation at the Fourth IOS Annual Conference “Breaking the Ice of Frozen Conflicts? Understanding Territorial Conflicts in East and Southeast Europe,” held by Institut für Ost- und Südosteuropaforschung, in Regensburg, Germany, on June 30 – July 2, 2016. (PDF) Oleksandr Tytarchuk, Maksym Khylko

Brexit: a Challenge and Opportunity for Ukraine

thumbnail of 2016-07 Brexit a Challenge and Opportunity for Ukraine EESRI-C-ENG

Like any other crisis, the Brexit simultaneously brings both risks and opportunities – for the United Kingdom itself, for the European Union and for third parties, including Ukraine. The positive/negative balance of the outcome largely depends on how skilfully international actors deal with the new situation. (PDF) Maksym Khylko

NATO, the EU and the OSCE in the Handling of the Russia-Ukraine Conflict: Competitive Synergy or “Freezing” Crisis Management?

NATO, EU, OSCE and Civil Society - small

The article offers a general perspective on the involvement of NATO, the EU and the OSCE in the handling of the Russia–Ukraine conflict in terms of interim lessons learned and best practices for exerting international efforts to bring peace and security in the region amid the ongoing deep European security crisis. (PDF) Oleksandr Tytarchuk, Maksym Khylko

Nagorno-Karabakh: Azerbaijan Will Not Admit Maintaining Frozen Conflict On Its Territory

thumbnail of 2016-06 Azerbaijan won’t admit frozen Karabakh conflict – EESRI-C-ENG

After tensions between Armenia and Azerbaijan flared in April 2016, the international mediators stepped up again, but there is little hope that they would ever be interested in solving this problem. The patience of the Azerbaijani side that had been negotiating with no progress for 20 years is over; the uncertain situation around the Nagorno-Karabakh harms local population, regional stability and important international projects. (PDF) Rusif Huseynov

  • All rights are reserved. The content of the website is a subject to copyright and other intellectual property rights under the law, and may be cited only with the appropriate credit provided to the respective author(s) and EESRI Foundation with a hyper-link to the EESRI.org. No portion of this site may be copied, reproduced, sold or otherwise used for any commercial purpose without clearly expressed written permission of the EESRI Foundation.
  • Partners