Black Sea Security after Russian Invasion of Ukraine

Security Challenges Caused by the Belarus Crisis

Rethinking the De-Occupation Policy of Ukraine. Analytical Report

NATO’s Support to Ukraine: Brief Guide 2020

Russian Military Presence in Ukraine and Its Impact on Human Rights Situation

Eastern Partnership: Progress in Turbulent Times

Ukraine-NATO: Long Path to Effective Cooperation

Threats to Security of Ukraine and other Countries of the Eastern Partnership Region and Possible Responses: Expert Survey

Security Challenges and Rule of Law: Ukraine’s Experience and Perspectives During the Italian OSCE Chairmanship

Security Options for Eastern Europe

Strengthening Human Security as a Core of Democratic Law-Making in Ukraine

Human Security – Important Element for Democracy Building in Armenia

Brief Guide on NATO’s support to Ukraine. Facts & Infographic

Assessment of the Risks Environment for Doing Business in Ukraine

Armenia and Russia Pursue Joint Military Forces

The Russo-Armenian agreement on establishing a joint military unit predictably causes anxiety in Azerbaijan and Georgia.

NATO’s Support: Making Ukraine More Secure and Resilient

Tolerance and Non-Discrimination: Current Situation and Ukraine’s Perspective

Statement delivered by Maksym Khylko on behalf of the East European Security Research Initiative Foundation at the OSCE Human Dimension Implementation Meeting, held in Warsaw, Poland, on September 26, 2016.

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and “Grey” Zones of its Application in the OSCE Area

Food for thought paper delivered by Oleksandr Tytarchuk on behalf of the East European Security Research Initiative Foundation at the OSCE Human Dimension Implementation Meeting, held in Warsaw, Poland, on September 20, 2016.

Human Rights on the Occupied Territories: The Case of Ukraine

Presentation of statement delivered by Natalya Belitser, Pylyp Orlyk Institute for Democracy, at the Conference “On the frontline: human rights situation in the EaP countries”, held in Chisinau, Moldova, on September 19, 2016.

EU‘s Global Strategy for Foreign and Security Policy: Implications for Eastern European Security

Experts commented on the probable implications of the adopted “Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy” for establishing a more peaceful, stable and secure environment in the Eastern European region

The EU-Ukraine Association Agreement and its impact on East European security and stability

Food for thought paper delivered by Oleksandr Tytarchuk on behalf of the EESRI Foundation at the Concluding Meeting of the 24th OSCE Economic and Environmental Forum, held in Prague, Czech Republic, on September 15, 2016.

Human Security Dimension across the Frozen Conflicts in the Post-Soviet Space

An analysis of the serious problems arising from the so-called frozen conflicts in the post-soviet region forms the basis of this policy paper with particular reference to human security in South Ossetia, Abkhazia, Nagorno-Karabakh and Transnistria.

Ukraine as a Battleground for the Future of Europe

Policy Paper by Oleksandr Tytarchuk, Maksym Khylko and Grigorij Mesežnikov, published in the framework of the Charter’97 Foundation’s project “The European Answer to the Eurasian Challenge,” supported by the International Visegrad Fund.

NATO, the EU and the OSCE in the Handling of the Russia-Ukraine Conflict: Competitive Synergy or “Freezing” Crisis Management?

A general perspective on the involvement of NATO, the EU and the OSCE in the handling of the Russia–Ukraine conflict in terms of interim lessons learned and best practices for exerting international efforts to bring peace and security in the region amid the ongoing deep European security crisis.

Slovakia’s Foreign Policy Priorities

Experts comment on the probable changes in Slovakia’s foreign policy, especially with respect to the Visegrad Group, Eastern Partnership, European Union, NATO, Ukraine, and Russia.

Belarus: National Security and Defence (August 2020)

By EESRI | September 17, 2020 - 5:01 pm |October 28, 2020 Comments & Policy Briefs (ENG)

The existing system of power in Belarus does not meet the expectations of the society, but the regime is not showing readiness for transformation. This means that the conflict with varying degrees of intensity will continue until the complete dismantle of the ruling regime.

(PDF)

Andrei Porotnikov

Tagged Belarus, National Security, Security and Defense Sector. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.

All rights are reserved. The content of the website is a subject to copyright and other intellectual property rights under the law, and may be cited only with the appropriate credit provided to the respective author(s) and EESRI with a hyper-link to the EESRI.org. No portion of this site may be copied, reproduced, sold or otherwise used for any commercial purpose without clearly expressed written permission of the EESRI.
Partners

My Tweets

PUBLICATIONS

Comments & Policy Briefs (ENG)

Comments & Policy Briefs (RUS)

Comments & Policy Briefs (UKR)

Conference Papers

ISSUES
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Baltic States
Belarus
Black Sea
Caucasus
Conflict Resolution
Crimea
Crisis Management
CSTO
Donbas
Eastern Europe
Eastern Partnership
Economic Security
Energy Tariffs
EUAM-Ukraine
European Neighbourhood Policy
European Security
European Union
France
Frozen Conflict
Georgia
Germany
Human Dimension
Human Rights
Human Security
Hybrid Warfare
Moldova
Monitoring Mission
Nagorno-Karabakh
National Security
NATO
Normandy Format
OSCE
OSCE ODIHR
OSCE PCU
Peace Talks
Propaganda
Protests
Russia
Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Security and Defense Sector
Slovakia
Transnistria
Trust Funds
Turkey
Ukraine